✓ What scores marks
- Take a clear personal stance on the prompt and develop it with reasons and your own experience / observation.
- Structure the monologue: open with your position, give 2–3 supported points, then a reflective close.
- Speak in fluent Chinese with a range of vocabulary and connectives; aim for the full speaking time.
✗ What loses marks
- A list of disconnected sentences with no through-line, or drying up well short of time.
- Staying abstract with no concrete personal example; thin vocabulary / repetitive structures.
How to structure your answerOpen with your stance → 2–3 developed points with a personal example → reflective close. Speak for the full time in fluent Chinese.
For this questionTop band: Take a clear position on the claim that peer pressure brings ONLY negative effects — agree, disagree, or partially agree, then substantiate throughout. Concede the real negatives (pressure to conform in fashion/phones/parties, stress) but the rich vein is the positive case: study groups that pull you along, sport training, 良性竞争, the sense of belonging. Use NON-digital, lived examples (subject choices, fashion, sport, study habits) and an intercultural note — peer dynamics in Chinese family settings vs Australian school culture — with a 首先/其次/最后 spine for the full ~3.5 minutes.
Common slip: Re-running Question 3's brand-comparison scenario (球鞋攀比) as your example set — markers are steered to expect fresh, non-digital examples here, so recycled Section I material earns no new credit. And don't argue both sides without landing: the word 只会 in the claim invites you to refute 'only', which is the cleanest structure — but you must still commit to a view.